Abstract IntroductionSmoking is a modifiable risk factor; effective tobacco control measures can reduce the prevalence of smoking in the population. Survey data has shown that smoking prevalence has a clear gradient by socio-economic deprivation (ranging from 27.2% in the most deprived to 7.9% in the least deprived, Annual Population Survey (APS), 2016), but how much of this can be explained by the characteristics of the respondents in each group?MethodsWe analysed responses to the question ‘Do you smoke cigarettes at all nowadays?’ from the APS for England residents aged 18 and over. We assigned each respondent to a deprivation decile based on their lower super output area of residence and used logistic regression to explore if the characteristics of the groups (including age, sex, general health, qualifications and benefits status) account for any of the difference in smoking rates between deciles.ResultsRespondents in the most deprived group had more than 4 times the odds of being a smoker compared with those in the least deprived (Odds Ratio (OR) 4.74, 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) 4.42-5.08). Other factors accounted for more than half of the difference (Adjusted OR 2.00, 95%CI 1.86-2.14).ConclusionIndividual characteristics can somewhat explain the differences in smoking prevalence between the deprivation deciles. Further investigation would allow us to explore whether particular combinations of inequalities require targeted intervention in order to reduce smoking prevalence overall. Funding Not applicable.
Abstract IntroductionSmoking is a modifiable risk factor; effective tobacco control measures can reduce the prevalence of smoking in the population. Survey data has shown that smoking prevalence has a clear gradient by socio-economic deprivation (ranging from 27.2% in the most deprived to 7.9% in the least deprived, Annual Population Survey (APS), 2016), but how much of this can be explained by the characteristics of the respondents in each group?MethodsWe analysed responses to the question ‘Do you smoke cigarettes at all nowadays?’ from the APS for England residents aged 18 and over. We assigned each respondent to a deprivation decile based on their lower super output area of residence and used logistic regression to explore if the characteristics of the groups (including age, sex, general health, qualifications and benefits status) account for any of the difference in smoking rates between deciles.ResultsRespondents in the most deprived group had more than 4 times the odds of being a smoker compared with those in the least deprived (Odds Ratio (OR) 4.74, 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) 4.42-5.08). Other factors accounted for more than half of the difference (Adjusted OR 2.00, 95%CI 1.86-2.14).ConclusionIndividual characteristics can somewhat explain the differences in smoking prevalence between the deprivation deciles. Further investigation would allow us to explore whether particular combinations of inequalities require targeted intervention in order to reduce smoking prevalence overall. Funding Not applicable.
By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS). USER TERMS AND CONDITIONS | PRIVACY POLICY
Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies
Anonymous User Privacy Preferences
Strictly Necessary Cookies (Always Active)
MULTILEARNING platforms and tools hereinafter referred as “MLG SOFTWARE” are provided to you as pure educational platforms/services requiring cookies to operate. In the case of the MLG SOFTWARE, cookies are essential for the Platform to function properly for the provision of education. If these cookies are disabled, a large subset of the functionality provided by the Platform will either be unavailable or cease to work as expected. The MLG SOFTWARE do not capture non-essential activities such as menu items and listings you click on or pages viewed.
Performance Cookies
Performance cookies are used to analyse how visitors use a website in order to provide a better user experience.